This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are used for visitor analysis, others are essential to making our site function properly and improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Click Accept to consent and dismiss this message or Deny to leave this website. Read our Privacy Statement for more.
Environmental Governance Post-Brexit



The UK’s preparations to leave the EU are picking up pace as ‘exit day’ looms large on the horizon. Whilst media headlines are focused on the Government’s ongoing negotiations with the EU, the Environment Secretary and Defra civil servants are right now working out the practical implementation of legislation, related strategies and other scenarios. 

One of their key challenges is around the so-called ‘governance gap’ that the Society, alongside the wider environmental community, raised in the run-up to the EU (Withdrawal) Bill being brought before Parliament. The challenge arises because the Bill-turned-Act directly lifts and transfers EU legislation into the UK, which includes all of its references to its component legal bodies and processes, and, though these references can be readily edited, the UK currently does not have a body or bodies that can replace those we have under the EU system and replicate their accountability mechanisms, hence the gap. 

Take, for example, the issue of air quality, which has gained significant media attention in recent months. The UK, as well as a number of other EU member states, has air pollution levels that contravene EU legislation, thus the European Commission is able to take these member states to the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU, or sometimes referred to as the ECJ), which can impose financial penalties (more here)

This jurisdiction of the CJEU (indeed, the overriding authority of EU bodies in general) is a key source of tension for many pro-Leave campaigners. The Government has to manage this alongside its promises to ensure that the environmental protections and standards we currently enjoy and now expect are maintained. And turning this into a workable set of measures is now perhaps the single most pressing issue for the full range of environmental and sustainability professionals because the legislation and strategies developed for specific sectors, such as the forthcoming replacements for the EU Common Agricultural Policy or the Common Fisheries Policy, should be enforceable against the governance system that now needs to be established.

The Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Michael Gove, has recognised and accepts this need. Defra’s 25 Year Environment Plan, published in January 2018 (just as the EU Withdrawal Bill was moving from the House of Commons to the Lords), set out Gove’s intention to “ensure strong governance” and “set up a world-leading environmental watchdog, an independent, statutory body, to hold Government to account for upholding environmental standards” – or at least to consult on plans to set such up.

Defra opened this 12-week consultation on 10th May. Almost immediately (18th May), the Environmental Audit Committee launched an inquiry into Defra’s consultation paper. And just a few weeks later (on 13th June), the EU (Withdrawal) Bill was amended to include an obligation for Environment Secretary to bring before Parliament, by the 26th December 2018, a Bill that sets out a full suite of environmental principles, a statutory statement about their interpretation and plans for the establishment of a public body dedicated to environmental governance.

The Society responded to this consultation, both individually and as part of the Environmental Policy Forum, and these responses can be viewed below by clicking on the menus.

The Society’s Chair (also Chair of the Environmental Policy Forum), wrote to the Chair of the Environmental Audit Committee, Mary Creagh MP, to offer our initial response to the consultation on environmental governance, which can be read below:

 

Then, collaborating with professional body colleagues under the banner of the EPF, the Society organised and contributed towards a collective, ‘high-level’ response to the consultation from CIEEM, CIWEM, CIWM, IEMA, IES, IFM and the Landscape Institute. This response, which was submitted directly to Defra’s Environmental Regulations EU Exit Team, is shown below:

 

The Society also responded to the consultation via the Citizen Space Webportal questionnaire. Our position was very closely aligned to that of the EPF, of course, though we took the opportunity to stress the need for the leadership of this new body to be made up of individuals with professional experience and proven competence in the environmental and sustainability sector. You can read our responses to the open text questions below:

 

Professional bodies licensed to award the Chartered Environmentalist registration:

Society for the Environment
EC1.1 Enterprise Centre, Puma Way 
Coventry, West Midlands CV1 2TT.
© Copyright 2018 Society for the Environment. All rights reserved.

Privacy Statement