This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are used for visitor analysis, others are essential to making our site function properly and improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Click Accept to consent and dismiss this message or Deny to leave this website. Read our Privacy Statement for more.
Policy and Parliamentary Update
Blog Home All Blogs
Updates on policy work taking place at the Society for our email newsletter. Updates from February 2019 onwards are from SocEnv's Policy and Communications Officer, Sarah Ridgeon.

 

Search all posts for:   

 

Top tags: Policy  Brexit  25 Year Environment Plan  DEFRA  Environment  Environmental Policy Forum  EPF  EU Withdrawal Bill  Gove  #policy  25YEP  APPG  Boris  Broadway  CEnv  Environment Bill  Environmental Professionals  Government  Great Repeal Bill  Industrial Strategy  Parliament  Prime Minister  REACH  Recess  REnvTech  Repeal Bill  Survey  Withdrawal Bill 

Partnerships, Peers and Perspective

Posted By Phil Underwood, 18 October 2017
Updated: 13 December 2017

A policy update by Dr Tatum Matharu, Policy and Parliamentary Lead.

Parliament returned from its summer recess with its ayes on Brexit. The EU Withdrawal Bill, commonly known as the ‘Repeal Bill’ (and formerly known as the ‘Great Repeal Bill’), had its second reading in the Commons on the 7th September and on the 11th, despite grumbles from within the party of Government and a three-line whip by the Opposition, it passed by 36 votes onto the committee stage, during which MPs will have just eight days of scrutiny. 

It is noteworthy that the European Communities Act 1972, which took us into what became the EU, and the European Communities (Amendment) Act 1993, which formalised the Treaty of the EU (a.k.a. the ‘the Maastricht Treaty’) into UK law, had 22 and 23 days at committee stage respectively. It seems, therefore, that there’s a relatively tight timeframe to influence MPs in their debates and potential amendments to the Bill, but we struck while the iron was hot. Collaborating with a number of our Licensed Bodies over the summer, we organised our concerns into a briefing hitting the desks of key ministers (Michael Gove at DEFRA and David Davis and Robin Walker at DExEU) as well as every single MP ahead of the vote. Read more, including the briefing and its media coverage, here.  

It’s widely understood that hundreds of amendments are being suggested and circulated amongst MPs for support, so much so that the Bill’s return to Parliament for its committee stage (previously thought to be this week) has now been delayed. Like much else about Brexit, there is a huge degree of uncertainty and a whole lot of watching and waiting for signals that may help strategically to steer a course for sharing environmentalists’ concerns about what happen after Brexit. 

However, who or what to influence is arguably more readily understandable as we can more safely assume that, given our situation of minority government, there are significant opportunities to bring our collective expertise to bear on the full range of parliamentary avenues. Backbench MPs, opposition parties and various committees and groups in both Houses are now extraordinarily significant, as is working in partnership. Indeed, we have recently sent our briefing to a House of Lords select committee that had called for evidence regarding the constitutional implications of the Bill, and we plan to target Peers with our briefing once we have a clearer idea of when the Bill will enter the upper chamber’s debate and scrutiny processes.  

At the same time, it is necessary to keep things in perspective. It is easy to think the Repeal Bill is the only game in town but, whilst it sets up the processes and procedures for our post-Brexit work, the implications of Brexit will be felt in a range of different policy areas as well as the connections between them. It is important for the Society to channel the collective expertise of our registrants to such debates, as we did, for example, by joining a recent discussion hosted by the All Party Parliamentary Group on Agroecology on their report regarding the impact of new trade agreements on sustainable food and farming. We will continue to work in such fora and, as ever, we invite your contributions so please do get in touch with me directly if you would like to become more involved. 

Tags:  Environment  EU Withdrawal Bill  Great Repeal Bill  Policy  Repeal Bill  Withdrawal Bill 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Industrial Strategy Response

Posted By Phil Underwood, 07 June 2017
Updated: 13 December 2017

A policy update by Dr Tatum Matharu, Policy and Parliamentary Lead.

 

We now have a Policy and Parliamentary Lead in post at the Society, dedicated to delivering our strategic aim of facilitating the collective influence of environmental professionals. Part of this role involves responding to Government consultations and calls for evidence.

One recent example of this relates to the Government’s proposed industrial strategy (before the June 8th election). The Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy’s green paper Building our Industrial Strategy sets out a vision for improving living standards and driving economic growth, however it did not adequately consider the environment in its plans.

We collaborated with our Constituent Bodies to share key messages in our response.

First and foremost, we underlined the need for sustainability in the industrial strategy, emphasising that economic sustainability is predicated on environmental sustainability and that long-term and holistic stewardship of our natural capital is the foundation of sustainable growth.

We called upon the Government to honour its commitments made under the Paris Agreement and Climate Change Act and to demonstrate leadership in working towards implementing the UN Sustainable Development Goals.

In light of our forthcoming negotiations in exiting the European Union, we stressed the importance of continued collaboration with our European neighbours, calling for recognition that our common resources are not bound by national borders. 

We repeatedly championed the value of Chartered Environmentalists and Registered Environmental Technicians as competent environmental professionals working across a range of sectors and technical disciplines, who are able to participate in stakeholder engagement activities to ensure that good practice is implemented and the highest environmental standards are upheld.

You can read the Society’s full response here and view wider policy work on our dedicated policy page, including previous responses to consultations.

Dr Tatum Matharu, Policy and Parliamentary Lead


Sign Up for Newsletters

The Society for the Environment Newsletter is available to all Chartered Environmentalists and Registered Environmental Technicians, as well as all those interested in the work of the Society and our registrants. To find out how to sign up to receive these directly to your inbox, please follow the appropriate links below:

  • Chartered Environmentalists and Registered Environmental Technicians, opt-in via your website account. Find out how here
  • Other interested parties, please simply sign up here. A website account will be set up for you, where you can amend your preferences at any time. 

Tags:  Environment  Industrial Strategy  Policy 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Professional bodies licensed to award the Chartered Environmentalist registration:

Society for the Environment
Davis Building, 189 Railway Terrace, 
Rugby, UK, CV21 3HQ.
© Copyright 2020 Society for the Environment. All rights reserved.

Privacy Statement